🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a disagreement between a shuttered park, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated discussion over their future often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been closely studied by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the federal government blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the federal government covers the cost of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious situation.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something Kristy Burgess observed personally.

She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a position that entailed earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless surprised by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She cultivated a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.

“One whale chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They changed the way I perceive relationships.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s relationship with the whales evolved against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her time at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the park attributes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say points to the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly consequences of the shutdown. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not comment to a inquiry, but in the past asserted: “The whales … receive far better medical attention and 24/7 attention than any person in the UK, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was terminated from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park thought information of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was fired not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable manpower”, equipment and machinery.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs requests for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a request to send the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a perpetual life in confinement and a return to performance for audiences,” the official wrote. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience permit an export that would prolong the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks reflect a wider incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As authorities struggle to find a answer, proposals have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A planned refuge in the province of Nova Scotia, which now received official endorsement, has been most controversial. The future facility, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a long term resolution for some of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the possibility of a refuge indicates a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a feasible plan in the short term.

The project lead, head of the initiative, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|